The question this resource answers
Sort user-entered theme counts from a documented feedback sample; retain caveats beside the observations. It is written for editors organizing genuine review observations, with the focus kept on feedback theme board. The aim is a usable record or calculation rather than another generic product-ranking page.
Gather the inputs before interpreting the result
The worksheet asks for: One theme and count per line, e.g. Packaging clarity: 8; Sample definition and source reference. Keep the relevant package, item reference or source document nearby when completing a field. If the source does not establish a fact, leave it unresolved rather than replacing it with a plausible assumption.
How the working is performed
Use one consistent coding rule and retain the original review references separately. The tool orders your entered counts; a single review may mention multiple themes, so totals are not necessarily a count of people.
Work through a concrete case
A theme count of eight in a coded sample tells you how often that theme was recorded. It does not establish an eight-person endorsement or product efficacy.
What the result cannot establish
Do not publish invented counts. This tool does not retrieve reviews, judge their authenticity or produce a star score. Review the original item and source before turning a worksheet result into a purchase statement. A calculation can be correct while an input is incomplete, outdated or attached to the wrong product.
Retain a reviewable record
Keep the date, item identity and the source behind any product-specific statement. If you share an output, retain its assumptions and limitations alongside it. Use the interactive tool to reproduce the working rather than presenting an unexplained number or verdict.